Tuesday, March 29, 2011

Greenstone Azithromycin

political importance of stupidity

Erasmo de Rotterdam (1466-1536), fue un gran pensador y humanista que vivió en la época de Lutero y el enfrentamiento del protestantismo frente al poder de Roma.   A pesar de su amistad con Martín Lutero, el sabio no se puso ni con los protestantes ni con los católicos. Los protestantes creían en la libertad, y decían que no hacía falta una Iglesia para alcanzar la salvación. Por su parte, los católicos, prácticamente negaban la capacidad humana de ser libres.
Todas las obras de Erasmo fueron censuradas e incluidas en el "Índice de Obras Prohibidas" por el Concilio de Trento. De manera similar fueron denunciadas por la mayoría de los pensadores protestantes.
En 1511 se publicó su “Elogio de la locura”, obra en la que la Estulticia (la Estupidez personificada) critica satíricamente a la sociedad de su tiempo.
and attacks everything ... What's more stupid (in politics) that a candidate flattering the people to get their votes , buy favors his will gun for the applause of fools, sponges cheers, be walked in triumph like a flag, placed in the forum ("rally?) as a statue for the contemplation of the people? ...
This foolishness is engendered nations, maintains empires, magistrates, religion, council and justice , because human life is not ultimately but a fool's game .
's been 500 years since Erasmus wrote this book. I hope this brief reference to their interest. I'm not talking about economics.

Zabaleta Mark

Thursday, March 24, 2011

What Does It Is Not A Low Calorie Food Mean

David Ricardo, "The Theory of Comparative Advantage"

Ricardo and Malthus were contemporaries and worked on developing the ideas presented by Adam Smith.
David Ricardo (1772-1823) began working with 14 years in the London Stock Exchange. He specialized in public equity, and 40 years and had a respectable fortune. After reading Adam Smith began publishing his ideas on the subject of money.
In 1817 appeared his Principles of Political Economy and Taxation ". This book has stood as the chief economic analyst of his time. When he became a Member of Parliament was regarded as Professor in economics from the House of Commons.
Ricardo said work crucial common denominator in all production lines and supported the free trade of agricultural products, developing "theory of comparative advantage": comparing the amounts of labor necessary to obtain the goods in different countries. Each country could specialize in the production of that commodity in which it had a comparative advantage.
for England was clear that improved its national interests when imports were concentrated in agricultural products, offering in return the British manufactures. Ricardo advocated the abolition of the Corn Laws (Protection of English landowners and their production of wheat)
This international trade required a sound financial system. According to Ricardo, the national monetary system should be regulated to prevent disruption of the international division of labor.
Issuance (manufacturing) of notes in a country threatened its commercial position. More money with the same assets was an increase in prices ... then exports would be less competitive and imports more attractive.
Ricardo opted for an alternative "puffs" and held that the domestic money supply should comply strictly with the country's gold reserves.
in an embryonic form, David Ricardo summarized the theory of the gold standard.
the end of his life, despite having criticized the landowners, land Ricardo spent most of his fortune.
Zabaleta Mark

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Explain What Sport About

Malthus and the "poverty of nations"

Malthus was described as "the best man reviled for his time." Following the publication in 1776 of the work of Adam Smith "The origin and cause of the Wealth of Nations", Robert Malthus (1766-1834), cleric, agreed to fame with Essay on the Principle of Population " (1798) : ... "I think I can dare to state two postulates. First, that nutrients are necessary for human existence. Secondly, the passion between the sexes is necessary and remain roughly at its current state ... Assuming, then, that my assumptions are true, I affirm that the power of population is indefinitely greater than the land to produce goods subsistence to man. population when all the brakes, increases in a geometrical progression. Livelihood assets only increase in an arithmetic progression. A slight acquaintance with numbers reveals the immensity of the first power in comparison with the second. "
is clear that Malthus clearly underestimated the pace of technological progress, the agricultural revolution that eventually allowed to feed more people, the ability of international trade and techniques for limiting fertility.
In poor areas of the world without embargo, actualmente las previsiones malthusianas parecen recobrar su fundamento.
No es extraño que se haya dicho que Malthus convirtió el análisis de Adam Smith sobre la “Riqueza de las Naciones” en un análisis de la “Pobreza de las Naciones”.
Mark de Zabaleta
http://www.markdezabaleta.com/